Presidential debates: A computer used sentiment analysis to watch the debates, and it thinks Clinton is happy and Trump is angry and quite sad.


Presidential debates: A computer used sentiment analysis to watch the debates, and it thinks Clinton is happy and Trump is angry and quite sad.
We’ve got opinions. Our brains, after all, are not computers. But what if computers could watch the debates?

October 21, 2016 at 11:34AM
via Digg http://ift.tt/2dUooiv

What happens when computers watch Hillary and Donald debate


What happens when computers watch Hillary and Donald debate
Four graduate students from Columbia University’s Data Science Institute built an application called Debate in (E)motion that ‘watches’ the debate, captures a video frame every five seconds and spits out a score on how confident it was that it recognizes a set of emotions.

October 21, 2016 at 09:37AM
via Digg http://ift.tt/2dGgz2c

Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are $535 less expensive than PCs


Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are $535 less expensive than PCs
In 2015, IBM let their employees decide – Windows or Mac. And the company found that not only do PCs drive twice the amount of support calls, they’re also three times more expensive — depending on the model, IBM is saving anywhere from $273 – $543 per Mac compared to a PC, over a four-year lifespan.

October 21, 2016 at 09:37AM
via Digg http://ift.tt/2eOlpgd