The potential around AI in finance is tangible right now and with it comes both opportunity and risk. Vendors promise faster closes, automated reporting and real-time insights, while finance leaders face increasing pressure to modernize and keep pace with the AI revolution. Across the mid-market, AI is being embedded into financial workflows at a pace that can outstrip the governance structures needed to make it safe.

This gap is giving rise to a new category of risk that professionals working closely with finance teams are increasingly calling “black box AI.” It represents a challenge the industry must address head-on. Black box AI refers to any finance deployment where outputs cannot be traced or governed. It appears as unverifiable recommendations, automation that bypasses normal approval workflows, or analytics tools that surface a headline figure without a clear path back to the underlying transaction. The outputs may look credible on the surface, but when an auditor asks what changed, who approved it and why, finance teams encounter real problems.

Finance teams have long lived by a simple principle: if you cannot trace it, you cannot trust it. That mantra has not changed with AI; what has changed is that technology can either reinforce that discipline or undermine it. The outcome depends on how AI is built and what providers are willing to be held accountable for.

Assistive versus autonomous: A distinction that matters

Not all AI carries the same risk profile. For finance leaders, the crucial distinction is between AI that assists in a controlled environment and AI that acts autonomously. Assistive AI flags issues and guides decisions through existing approval structures. It identifies an exception, spots a coding anomaly, or highlights unusual movements, and then puts a human in the driving seat. The finance professional can see the source transaction, the rule behind the flag, and the approval record. Every action the AI takes leaves a clear audit trail.

Autonomous AI, by contrast, makes decisions silently. It allocates, codes, or adjusts without a visible audit trail, leaving teams unable to satisfy even basic reporting requirements. It may seem faster, but it quietly undermines the integrity of the numbers. The question every finance leader should ask their technology provider is simple: if something changes in our reporting, can we see exactly what happened, who approved it and why? If the answer is unclear or non-existent, that is a problem for the finance team to address.

Where governed AI delivers

Month-end close is where well-governed AI delivers the clearest practical return on investment, and it is worth being precise about what that looks like. The real win is not AI-generated narratives or automated reporting; it is catching issues earlier in the process before the stakeholder board packs go out, before pressure peaks and before rework begins. When AI surfaces exceptions at the right moment and directs them through existing channels, teams can close faster and with greater confidence in what they are signing off.

For organizations operating across multiple entities or currencies, this becomes even more valuable. AI can flag unusual movements at the subsidiary level before they surface as problems at group consolidation, but only when the underlying model is governed properly and the exception trail remains intact.

Raising the bar on what ‘finance-grade’ means

There is a version of AI in finance that makes teams more effective, and a version that makes things look faster while quietly compromising the controls that finance exists to uphold. The industry must be precise about what earns the label ‘finance-grade AI.’ Tools and analytics deserve that description only when a professional can analyze from a headline variance figure down to the underlying transactions and from there to the audit-trail evidence that explains that headline variance. Anything that breaks that process—however sophisticated it appears—is not fit for purpose in a governed finance function.

Finance leaders cannot adopt technology simply because it is fashionable. The right question is not whether AI can automate a process, but whether it can do so in a way that keeps the finance team genuinely in control of their numbers with a human in the loop. That standard should be non-negotiable and first on the checklist before any AI deployment goes live.

Protect your computer or network with the best internet security suite. This article was produced as part of TechRadar Pro Perspectives, our channel to feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today. The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing, find out more here: https://ift.tt/icG2XfQ

from Latest from TechRadar https://ift.tt/q5SRPCv
via IFTTT IA